I know you hate Microsoft. Now all I want to know is , why ?

Why ? Why is it ? Why do we do it ? Why do we all hate Microsoft ? It's just a very sensible and sincere questions, can somebody answer it genuinely, without terming me as a "Microsoft Evangelist". I mean , what I did was (a.) Raise some doubts about the ability of Microsoft to maintain the lead in an increasing competitive world and (b.) Based on a few observations, stated , in my humble opinion, that Microsoft seems to be a company that's very well aware of the changing dynamics of the marketplace and is working hard towards keeping up with the market. Was anything fundamentally wrong with this observation ? Well, my friend Ramjee thought so. Barely hours after I posted my last blog entry "Microsoft : Will the dominance continue? Yeah baby", Ramjee told me that "That was the most hard-core pro Microsoft stuff I have seen recently." Yeah right. And what do you have to say about the post that I wrote before that ? The one titled "Microsoft : Will the dominance continue?" where I raise doubts about the ability of Microsoft to be the king of the technology world. Did you actually read it ?

Let me take on his points, one-by-one. I post his comments in black followed by my reply in red.

Now I don't contradict what ever you have mentioned over here. It is true. But, then doing many things does not guarantee that it is the right thing that is being done. (Keep that in Mind).

Very well. Doing many things definitely do not guarantee that the right thing is being done. But whn you are spending billions of dollars on 'doing' many things. When you have top researchers from elite universities consulting on each such 'things'. When you have dedicated teams of engineers working on many such 'things', there's a high chance that at least 'some' of these things ought to be right. Right ?

Also one thing that one should understand as a technologist in business is, "Best Technology Does not Win". It is the cardinal rule.

Wow ! You've already assumes that all the technologies being developed at Microsoft are actually the "best technologies". Ahaan, thats a surprise, even for me

ipTV has been on radar of Microsoft ever since I know of them. (late 90's). However they haven't done anything significant to enhance the user experience. Today you have startups like joost, and host of others. M$ does not stand a chance here

So, what other companies you know of, that are selling a better IPTV platform than Microsoft ? "Joost" did you say ? Check it out again. The two are totally different things. Microsoft develops and markets platform technologies that allow telecom players to deploy IPTV services on TV, using their telecom networks. Three players in India are working on it. Airtel - already launched the pilot project in Gurgaon. Reliance - testing IPTV in Uttar Pradesh and Hutch-Vodafone. None of them has yet started the commercial rollouts. If and when the IPTV takes off, Microsoft will be supplying the integration and the deployment solutions for all of these. Secondly, Microsoft is having another technology called "LiveStation". This one is the closest that comes to Joost. If you wanna compare Joost with, compare it with Livestation.

Coming to convergence, where is convergence?? Do you see once device doing all the things that yo u need? That's a big NO!!
you have more and more devices doing more and more things, giving you the ability to interact seamlessly. Is that what you mean by convergence?

Where is convergence ???? Dude, you sure you wanna ask that question ? OK. Let me tell ya. When I use my mobile phone for checking my mails, listening to music, carrying around my data, as a phonebook and to organize my rendezvous , I call it convergence. "Do you see one device doing all the things that you need". No certainly not. My phone still cant wash the dishes, or mop my floor, or cook pasta. Stupid thing it cant even tell me how to propose to a girl. If that's what you mean by "One device doing all the things that you need", then you are right, we are not there yet.

Exactly DEC failed, Microsoft may not face the same fate (they are smart enough), but they are not good enough!

MS has over 90% share in desktop operating systems. If that's not "good enough", I don't know what is !

x-box ok!! was sure beaten by psp-2. Check out the figures for x-box 360. (M$ sells it at a loss). And mind you it is not a hot cake you made it out to be! Nintendo wii has overshadowed any gaming console ever in the history. WII is innovation not x-box 360. Adding more features to an existing mediocre product does not make it better

Firstly, it was NOT beaten up by PSP-2, but by PS-2.
"MS sells it at a loss" ! You have ANY idea how this business works ? OK ! Now, let me educate you on this one. Companies develop consoles which they sell to the customers at a loss. Yes, thats the part of the business. The idea is that discounted price will entice more and more customers into buying the consoles. And once people have the consoles, they WILL buy the game titles. The companies make money on these game titles. That's the business model, dude. Even Playstation is sold for a loss. Check your stats. This is just to say that HP is not doing a good business on printers because every printer that they sell, they sell it at a loss. It's the same thing. HP makes more than it loses out on the printer cartridges. The cartridges make the money. Not the printer. We have a similar situation in Media. where the newspapers are sold at losses. So the Bennett & Coleman company (thats the company behind The Times of India, in case you did not know) loses a good deal on every newspaper copy that's sold. The money flows in through the advertisements. Thats the business model.

And Nintendo surely did a splendid job. I'm myself a fan of Wii and the way its outselling any other gaming console in the history. But whoever says if thats a winner, others can't. The fact remains (and I can support it with data), that X-Box 360 is a commercial success for Microsoft. Although I'm not claiming its the # 1 gaming console.

Coming to execution, VISTA!!!

Agreed.

Yes M$ surface is great. No doubt about that. But how is it going to revolutionize stuff. Wait and watch, there are a few startups in the space which I am sure by end of the year will make surface look like a kiddo.

What startups ? And what are these technologies ? Be specific. List the technologies if you know of them.I liked what I saw.And if there are others doing things better, I would be interested in seeing them as well. Trust me, nobody wants this space to evolve better than me.

M$ was smart and lucky with IBM (read the story about it).

Irrelevant comment. 25 years is a long time. And a company has to have more than "luck" to be at the top for 25 long years.

there are many things that you haven't broached which will make the difference.
1) The world of tomorrow is no longer based on desktops. Its connected world.
2) User power is the name of the game today.

Nobody is doubting that. However, how you concluded Microsoft is not aware of these two factors, when you are, I fail to understand.

In the end, I don't want M$ to go

And that, is the whole point. You don't WANT Microsoft to go. That's it. You have any reason to support that ? I'm not pro-Microsoft or something like that. Give me a valid reason for thrashing Microsoft and watch me at my best. But the reason that "I don't want M$ to go" just doesn't cuts in. No , I refuse to be partial. I need reasons to believe in. I need evidences. Baseless assumptions and views just doesn't makes sense to me.

M$ will not vanish off as many other companies did, but it no longer can sit on the huge cash piles and say, I am the King. It has to slog it out just like any one.

Agreed. Look harder, you can see that happening.


Another of my friend recently attended an Open Source Conference in the city yesterday and on coming back told me how Windows will lose out on market share completely in four years. Wow ! Predictions ! Let me tell you when I first heard this prediction. It was mid-1998. That was about 9 years back. I started reading about Linux and all. And everyone predicted the death of MS in two years flat. Four "two years" have passed since then, and Microsoft still beats Linux base 9 : 1.

I'm all for the open source movement and free software. I personally feel softwares should be available to anybody and everybody. And it should be completely customizable. And the open source community and Linux users do a great job doing all that. And I would expect Microsoft to come up openly in support of the Open Source movement. Although this may seem contradictory in the beginning, a closer look at Microsoft will tell us that Microsoft is actually more pro-open source than some of its contemporaries like Apple. Whereas Apple maintains a tight-lip about the technologies used in their products, Microsoft is very well known to go out and help developers build applications around their platform and products. Microsoft , in this sense, is more pro- Open Source than Apple.

All I want to say is, can we stop thrashing MS and Mr. Gates , without any reason ? Agreed, there are products better than Microsoft's but hey, Microsoft doesn't makes crappy products as well. For, if it's granted that they do, then I must say to continue making crappy products for 25 years and still stay at the top is a real feat and hats off to Bill Gates for fooling us for this long.